Friday, April 25, 2014

Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Driving Influence Alcohol

9:48 PM | Posted by Unknown | Edit Post
Virginia DUI Prince William Lawyers

Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with a traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you? 

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?

We have defended many traffic tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Lawrence v. Commonwealth

Facts:

A general district court found defendant guilty of driving under influence (DUI) of alcohol under Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266. Defendant appealed. A jury in the circuit court found defendant guilty as charged. The Circuit Court of Prince William (Virginia) denied defendant's motion to set aside the verdict and entered final judgment. Defendant appealed.

            If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • When considering a criminal conviction, an appellate court reviews the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth. Viewing the evidence through this evidentiary prism requires the appellate court to discard the evidence of the accused in conflict with that of the Commonwealth, and regard as true all the credible evidence favorable to the Commonwealth and all fair inferences to be drawn therefrom.
  • Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266(i) permits a factfinder to infer that the blood alcohol concentration (BAC) level determined by a timely breath test accurately states the BAC level at the time of driving. While sometimes called a "rebuttable presumption," the later-BAC-implies-prior-BAC principle underlying § 18.2-266(i) is no more than a permissible evidentiary inference that the factfinder may accept or reject. Understood that way, the inference violates no constitutional norms.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Labels: ,

Our Phone #

Prince William Virginia
Prince William 703-278-0405
Click here to call us toll free Sris Lawyer Click here to call us toll free

Social Icons

Powered by Blogger.