Monday, March 31, 2014
Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Violation Code 18.2-270
Virginia DUI
Prince William Lawyers
Below is a sample case of
traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been charged with a
traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned about the
consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?
We have defended many traffic
tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Peterson v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Defendant was convicted in
the Circuit Court of Prince William (Virginia) of felony driving under the
influence (DUI), third or subsequent offense, in violation of Va. Code Ann. §§
18.2-266 and 18.2-270. Defendant appealed.
If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a
SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can
reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The
Virginia Court made the following holding:
- In enacting Va. Code
Ann. § 46.2-384, the legislature, in its wisdom, determined that a
Department of Motor Vehicles transcript, certified pursuant to Va. Code
Ann. § 46.2-215, shall be prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein
with respect to the prior offense. Prima facie evidence is sufficient to
raise a presumption of fact or establish the fact in question unless
rebutted.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the
SRIS Law Group. They represent the
firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for
their authoritative content.
Saturday, March 29, 2014
Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Violation Code 18.2-266
Virginia DUI Prince
William Lawyers
Below is a sample case of
traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been charged with a
traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned about the
consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?
We have defended many traffic
tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Helen v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Defendant appealed from an
order of the Circuit Court of Prince William (Virginia) convicting her of
driving under the influence (DUI), second or subsequent offense, in violation
of Va. Code Ann. §§ 18.2-266 and 18.2-270.
If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a
SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can
reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The
Virginia Court made the following holding:
- Va. Code Ann. §
18.2-270(B)(2) governs repeat driving under the influence convictions
between five and ten years after a prior offense either under Virginia law
or any substantially similar laws of any other state. § 18.2-270(E).
- In Virginia , blood
alcohol concentration (BAC) results can create rebuttable presumptions
applicable to each subset of driving under the influence convictions under
Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266. Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-269(A). California law
employs rebuttable presumptions triggered by BAC test results. Cal. Veh. Code
§§ 23152(b), 23610(a)(3). In neither Virginia nor California are the BAC
presumptions mandatory or conclusive. Instead, Virginia and California
courts treat the presumptions as mere permissible inferences.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the
SRIS Law Group. They represent the
firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for
their authoritative content.
Friday, March 28, 2014
Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Second Offense
Virginia DUI
Prince William Lawyers
Below is a sample case of
traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been charged with a
traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned about the
consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?
We have defended many traffic
tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Tolson v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Defendant was arrested for
DUI first offense in Prince
William, and prior to trial, he was again arrested and charged with DUI second
offense. Prior to a trial de novo in the circuit court for the first arrest,
the district court convicted defendant of the lesser-included offense of DUI
first offense for the second charge. On review, the court reversed his
conviction for DUI second offense based on double jeopardy. Although a circuit
court had discretion under Va. Code Ann. § 16.1-137 to amend a defective
warrant, there could not be a trial de novo for the same offense after an
acquittal by a court having authority to try the offense. The impossibility
exception to double jeopardy did not apply because the Commonwealth had been
aware of defendant's prior DUI conviction and de novo appeal at the time of his
prosecution on the DUI second offense charge. Defendant's trial de novo on the
amended warrant charging DUI second offense could not be characterized as a
subsequent prosecution for a new offense arising out of facts discovered after
the conviction. Defendant was prosecuted for the same offense as originally
charged and tried in the district court, of which he had been acquitted.
If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a
SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can
reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The Virginia
Court made the following holding:
- In a trial de novo, a
circuit court disregards the judgment of the district court, hears the
evidence anew and may consider new evidence, and makes final disposition
of the case as if the case had not proceeded to judgment in the district
court. Once the trial de novo commences in the circuit court, the district
court judgment is annulled, and is not thereafter available for any
purpose.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
Wednesday, March 26, 2014
Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Third Offense Habitual Offender
Virginia DUI
Prince William Lawyers
Below is a sample case of
traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been charged with a
traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned about the
consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?
We have defended many traffic
tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Jacky v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Following a bifurcated trial
in Prince William, defendant was convicted of driving under the influence
(DUI), a third or subsequent offense within five years, and of driving after
being declared an habitual offender. The court found that the trial court did
not err by admitting evidence of defendant's prior DUI convictions, but did err
in admitting evidence of defendant's refusal to submit to field sobriety tests.
The court noted that Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-943 prohibited the introduction of
the entire traffic record during the guilt stage of trial but held that evidence
of the prior DUI convictions was admissible because prior DUI convictions did
not constitute the "traffic record" as contemplated by § 46.2-943
where the offense charged was a subsequent offense of DUI. The court held that
evidence of a refusal to submit to field sobriety tests, when used as evidence
that defendant refused because he believed he might fail, violated defendant's
right against self-incrimination under Va. Const. art. I, § 8. The court found
that the trial court erred by admitting evidence of defendant's refusal and
that the error was not harmless.
If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a
SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can
reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The
Virginia Court made the following holding:
- Evidence of prior
driving under the influence (DUI) convictions and evidence of prior
traffic records are not the same. Traffic records as contemplated by Va.
Code Ann. § 46.2-943 contain prior suspensions and revocations of a
driver's license and prior convictions of moving traffic violations,
including, but not limited to, DUI convictions. Thus, while evidence of a
prior DUI conviction may be a part of a traffic record, such evidence does
not necessarily constitute the traffic record for purposes of the
application of Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-943.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
Tuesday, March 25, 2014
Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Violation Code 18.2-266
Virginia DUI
Prince William Lawyers
Below is a sample case of
traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been charged with a
traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned about the
consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?
We have defended many traffic
tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Richardson v. Commonwealth
Facts:
The Circuit Court of Prince
William (Virginia) convicted defendant of driving while under the influence
(DUI) of drugs in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266. Defendant appealed.
If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a
SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can
reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The
Virginia Court made the following holding:
- On appeal, an appellate
court reviews the evidence in the light most favorable to the
Commonwealth. Therefore, the appellate court must discard the evidence of
the accused in conflict with that of the Commonwealth, and regard as true
all the credible evidence favorable to the Commonwealth and all fair
inferences to be drawn therefrom.
- Whether or not an
affirmative defense has been established is usually a question for the
trier-of-fact. The trier of fact determines the weight of evidence in
support of a claim of an affirmative defense. Furthermore, on appeal,
findings of fact made by the trial judge are presumed to be correct and
are given the same effect as a jury verdict, settling all conflicts in the
evidence in favor of the prevailing party. The trial court's findings of
fact are given deference, unless the findings are plainly wrong or without
evidence to support them.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
Friday, March 21, 2014
Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Violation Code 18.2-266
Virginia DUI
Prince William Lawyers
Below is a sample case of
traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been charged with a
traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned about the
consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?
We have defended many traffic
tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Kennedy v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Defendant was convicted in
Prince William General District Court (Virginia) for driving under the
influence of alcohol (DUI) in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266. On a de
novo appeal, he filed a motion to dismiss the charge and a motion to declare
parts of Va. Code Ann. §§ 18.2-269 and 18.2-270 unconstitutional.
If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a
SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can
reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The
Virginia Court made the following holding:
- The purpose of Va. Code
Ann. § 46.2-391.2's administrative license suspension (ALS) requirements
is civil in nature. The purpose of revoking a driver's license is not to
punish the offender but to remove from the highways an operator who is a
potential danger to other users. The ALS in Va. Code § 46.2-391.2 is a
remedial sanction because its purpose is to protect the public from
intoxicated drivers and to reduce alcohol related accidents and, therefore
it does not constitute punishment for purposes of double jeopardy.
Confirming this, the legislative history provides that the General
Assembly was motivated by its desire to reduce alcohol-related crashes,
fatalities, and injuries, and not to impose punishment.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the
SRIS Law Group. They represent the
firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for
their authoritative content.
Thursday, March 20, 2014
Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Code 18.2-266
Virginia DUI
Prince William Lawyers
Below is a sample case of
traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been charged with a
traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned about the
consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?
We have defended many traffic
tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Jim v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Following a bench trial in
the Circuit Court of Prince William (Virginia), defendant was convicted on an
amended indictment alleging that he violated Va. Code Ann. §§ 18.2-266, -270 by
unlawfully and feloniously operating a motor vehicle while under the influence
of alcohol (DUI) after having been convicted of 2 other DUI offenses within 10
years. Defendant appealed.
If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a
SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can
reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The
Virginia Court made the following holding:
- Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-270
enhances the offense and attendant punishment for driving under the
influence (DUI) from a misdemeanor to a felony upon conviction of a third
or subsequent offense committed within 10 years of an offense under Va.
Code Ann. § 18.2-266. The statute does not suggest that convictions for
the requisite prior offenses must precede commission of the third or
subsequent offense. Therefore, any third or subsequent DUI conviction
within the period prescribed by Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-270 triggers the
enhanced punishment. Otherwise, an offender could commit multiple unlawful
acts of driving under the influence of alcohol without fear of being
punished for a felony merely because the offender could not be tried and
convicted quickly enough between offenses. An interpretation of the
statute that allows a defendant to violate it with impunity would be
contrary to the clear legislative intent.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
Tuesday, March 18, 2014
Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Second Offense
Virginia DUI
Prince William Lawyers
Below is a sample case of
traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been charged with a
traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned about the
consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?
We have defended many traffic
tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Pollock v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Defendant was arrested for
DUI first offense in Prince William, and prior to trial, he was again arrested
and charged with DUI second offense. Prior to a trial de novo in the circuit
court for the first arrest, the district court convicted defendant of the
lesser-included offense of DUI first offense for the second charge. On review,
the court reversed his conviction for DUI second offense based on double
jeopardy. Although a circuit court had discretion under Va. Code Ann. §
16.1-137 to amend a defective warrant, there could not be a trial de novo for
the same offense after an acquittal by a court having authority to try the
offense. The impossibility exception to double jeopardy did not apply because
the Commonwealth had been aware of defendant's prior DUI conviction and de novo
appeal at the time of his prosecution on the DUI second offense charge.
Defendant's trial de novo on the amended warrant charging DUI second offense
could not be characterized as a subsequent prosecution for a new offense
arising out of facts discovered after the conviction. Defendant was prosecuted
for the same offense as originally charged and tried in the district court, of
which he had been acquitted.
If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a
SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can
reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The
Virginia Court made the following holding:
- In a trial de novo, a
circuit court disregards the judgment of the district court, hears the
evidence anew and may consider new evidence, and makes final disposition
of the case as if the case had not proceeded to judgment in the district
court. Once the trial de novo commences in the circuit court, the district
court judgment is annulled, and is not thereafter available for any
purpose.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg
Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Second Subsequent Offense Violation Code 18.2-270
Virginia DUI Prince
William Lawyers
Below is a sample case of
traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been charged with a
traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned about the
consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?
We have defended many traffic
tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Frank v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Defendant appealed from an
order of the Circuit Court of Prince William (Virginia) convicting her of
driving under the influence (DUI), second or subsequent offense, in violation
of Va. Code Ann. §§ 18.2-266 and 18.2-270.
If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a
SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can
reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The
Virginia Court made the following holding:
- The "substantially
similar" standard under Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-270(E) does not require
the statutes to be exact replicas of each other. They merely must be
similar (not identical) in a substantial (not insubstantial) way. The
statutes need not substantially conform in every respect to each other.
Thus, a court need not scrutinize the foreign statute for every
idiosyncratic, insubstantial difference between it and the Virginia
statute. It looks instead to the overall purpose of the two statutes, the
framework of their principal provisions, and the elements of their
respective offenses.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Suspended License
Virginia DUI
Prince William Lawyers
Below is a sample case of
traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been charged with a
traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned about the
consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?
We have defended many traffic
tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Keith v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Following defendant's DUI
arrest in Prince William, defendant's operator's license was suspended for
seven days pursuant to Va. Code Ann. 46.2-391.2, when testing revealed that
defendant's blood alcohol content was greater than .08 grams per 210 liters of
breath. Defendant moved to dismiss the outstanding DUI warrant, alleging that
both the administrative license suspension (ALS) and the DUI warrant placed him
twice in jeopardy in violation of the Fifth Amendment. The court denied the
motion. The court concluded that the ALS constituted punishment, that the ALS
and DUI were separate judicial proceedings, and that double jeopardy would
attach only if the commonwealth pursued both the ALS action and the DUI
prosecution based upon the per se results of the blood test pursuant to Va.
Code Ann. § 18.2-266(i). If the commonwealth relied on refusal to take the
blood alcohol test as a basis for the ALS action, its DUI prosecution under Va.
Code Ann. §§ 18.2-266(ii), (iii), or (iv) would not trigger the double jeopardy
bar. Given that defendant's warrant alleged only a general violation of Va.
Code Ann. § 18.2-266, the court denied defendant's motion to dismiss until the
commonwealth offered its proof.
If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a
SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can
reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The
Virginia Court made the following holding:
- Va. Code Ann. §
46.2-391.2 provides in part that if a breath test is taken pursuant to Va.
Code Ann. § 18.2-268.2 or any similar ordinance of any county, city, or
town and the results show a blood alcohol content of 0.08 percent or more
by weight or by volume or 0.08 grams or more per 210 liters of breath, or
the person refuses to submit to the breath test in violation of Va. Code
Ann. § 18.2-268.3 or any similar local ordinance, and upon issuance of a
warrant by the magistrate for a violation of Va. Code Ann. §§ 18.2-266 or
18.2-268.3, or any similar local ordinance, the person's license shall be
suspended immediately for seven days. The magistrate is a judicial officer
for this purpose and his decision is pursuant to a judicial proceeding.
Va. Const. art. VI, § 8. Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-48.1.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Violation Code 18.2-266
Virginia DUI
Prince William Lawyers
Below is a sample case of
traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been charged with a
traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned about the
consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?
We have defended many traffic
tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Attillis v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Defendant was convicted in
the Circuit Court of Prince William (Virginia) of felony driving under the
influence (DUI), third or subsequent offense, in violation of Va. Code Ann. §§
18.2-266 and 18.2-270. Defendant appealed.
If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a
SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can
reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The
Virginia Court made the following holding:
- In enacting Va. Code
Ann. § 46.2-384, the legislature, in its wisdom, determined that a
Department of Motor Vehicles transcript, certified pursuant to Va. Code
Ann. § 46.2-215, shall be prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein
with respect to the prior offense. Prima facie evidence is sufficient to
raise a presumption of fact or establish the fact in question unless
rebutted.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Second Subsequent Offense Violation Code 18.2-266
Virginia DUI
Prince William Lawyers
Below is a sample case of
traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been charged with a
traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned about the
consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?
We have defended many traffic
tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Frank v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Defendant was convicted in
the Circuit Court of Prince William (Virginia) of felony driving under the
influence (DUI), second or subsequent offense, in violation of Va. Code Ann. §§
18.2-266 and 18.2-270. Defendant appealed.
If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a
SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can
reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The
Virginia Court made the following holding:
- In enacting Va. Code
Ann. § 46.2-384, the legislature, in its wisdom, determined that a
Department of Motor Vehicles transcript, certified pursuant to Va. Code
Ann. § 46.2-215, shall be prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein
with respect to the prior offense. Prima facie evidence is sufficient to
raise a presumption of fact or establish the fact in question unless
rebutted.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Violation Code 18.2-266
Virginia DUI
Prince William Lawyers
Below is a sample case of
traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been charged with a
traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned about the
consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?
We have defended many traffic
tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Samuel v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Defendant appealed her
convictions by the Circuit Court of Prince William (Virginia), for driving
under the influence (DUI) of alcohol in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266
and for involuntary manslaughter in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-36.1(A).
If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a
SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can
reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The
Virginia Court made the following holding:
- Virginia's "implied
consent" law, as it existed at the time of the offense, provided
that: (A) any person who operates a motor vehicle upon a highway in this
Commonwealth shall be deemed thereby, as a condition of such operation, to
have consented to have samples of his blood, breath, or both blood and
breath taken for a chemical test to determine the alcohol, drug, or both
alcohol and drug content of his blood, if he is arrested for a violation
of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266 (driving under the influence) or of a similar
ordinance within two hours of the alleged offense. Section 18.2-268.2(A).
If the blood or breathalyzer test reveals a particular level of blood
alcohol content (.10 percent at the date of the instant offense), the Commonwealth
is entitled to a rebuttable presumption that the defendant was
intoxicated. Section § 18.2-269.
- Va. Code Ann. §
18.2-36.1 stated at the time of the offense that any person who, as a
result of driving under the influence in violation of § 18.2-266(ii),
(iii), or (iv), unintentionally causes the death of another person, shall
be guilty of involuntary manslaughter. Section 18.2-36.1(A).
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the
SRIS Law Group. They represent the
firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for
their authoritative content.
Tuesday, March 4, 2014
Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Violation Code 18.2-270
Virginia DUI
Prince William Lawyers
Below is a sample case of
traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been charged with a
traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned about the
consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?
We have defended many traffic
tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Thomas v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Defendant was convicted in
the Circuit Court of Prince William (Virginia) of felony driving under the
influence (DUI), third or subsequent offense, in violation of Va. Code Ann. §§
18.2-266 and 18.2-270. Defendant appealed.
If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a
SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can
reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The
Virginia Court made the following holding:
- In enacting Va. Code Ann.
§ 46.2-384, the legislature, in its wisdom, determined that a Department
of Motor Vehicles transcript, certified pursuant to Va. Code Ann. §
46.2-215, shall be prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein with
respect to the prior offense. Prima facie evidence is sufficient to raise
a presumption of fact or establish the fact in question unless rebutted.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
Monday, March 3, 2014
Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Driving Influence Alcohol
Virginia DUI
Prince William Lawyers
Below is a sample case of
traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been charged with a
traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned about the
consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?
We have defended many traffic
tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Moore v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Defendant appealed from the
judgment of the Circuit Court of Prince William (Virginia) that found him to be
a habitual offender pursuant to Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-351 et seq. Defendant had
multiple convictions for driving while under the influence of alcohol (DUI).
If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a
SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can
reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The
Virginia Court made the following holding:
- If a conviction in
another state is based on conduct which is not a violation of Va. Code
Ann. § 18.2-266, then to consider it under Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-351 would,
without authority, expand the scope of the convictions which could be
considered beyond that which the Virginia General Assembly specifically
authorized.
- In order to adjudicate a
defendant an habitual offender based upon a conviction from another state,
only that prohibition of the other state's law under which the person was
convicted must substantially conform to Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Our Phone #
Blog Archive
-
2014
(57)
- October(7)
- September(2)
- August(4)
- April(22)
-
March(15)
- Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Violation Code...
- Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Violation Code...
- Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Second Offense
- Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Third Offense ...
- Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Violation Code...
- Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Violation Code...
- Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Code 18.2-266
- Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Second Offense
- Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Second Subsequ...
- Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Suspended License
- Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Violation Code...
- Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Second Subsequ...
- Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Violation Code...
- Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Violation Code...
- Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Driving Influe...
- February(7)
Social Icons
Powered by Blogger.