Tuesday, March 18, 2014

Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Second Subsequent Offense Violation Code 18.2-270

Virginia DUI Prince William Lawyers

Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with a traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you? 

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?

We have defended many traffic tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Frank v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Defendant appealed from an order of the Circuit Court of Prince William (Virginia) convicting her of driving under the influence (DUI), second or subsequent offense, in violation of Va. Code Ann. §§ 18.2-266 and 18.2-270.
            If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • The "substantially similar" standard under Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-270(E) does not require the statutes to be exact replicas of each other. They merely must be similar (not identical) in a substantial (not insubstantial) way. The statutes need not substantially conform in every respect to each other. Thus, a court need not scrutinize the foreign statute for every idiosyncratic, insubstantial difference between it and the Virginia statute. It looks instead to the overall purpose of the two statutes, the framework of their principal provisions, and the elements of their respective offenses.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Suspended License

Virginia DUI Prince William Lawyers

Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with a traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you? 

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?

We have defended many traffic tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Keith v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Following defendant's DUI arrest in Prince William, defendant's operator's license was suspended for seven days pursuant to Va. Code Ann. 46.2-391.2, when testing revealed that defendant's blood alcohol content was greater than .08 grams per 210 liters of breath. Defendant moved to dismiss the outstanding DUI warrant, alleging that both the administrative license suspension (ALS) and the DUI warrant placed him twice in jeopardy in violation of the Fifth Amendment. The court denied the motion. The court concluded that the ALS constituted punishment, that the ALS and DUI were separate judicial proceedings, and that double jeopardy would attach only if the commonwealth pursued both the ALS action and the DUI prosecution based upon the per se results of the blood test pursuant to Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266(i). If the commonwealth relied on refusal to take the blood alcohol test as a basis for the ALS action, its DUI prosecution under Va. Code Ann. §§ 18.2-266(ii), (iii), or (iv) would not trigger the double jeopardy bar. Given that defendant's warrant alleged only a general violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266, the court denied defendant's motion to dismiss until the commonwealth offered its proof.

            If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-391.2 provides in part that if a breath test is taken pursuant to Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-268.2 or any similar ordinance of any county, city, or town and the results show a blood alcohol content of 0.08 percent or more by weight or by volume or 0.08 grams or more per 210 liters of breath, or the person refuses to submit to the breath test in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-268.3 or any similar local ordinance, and upon issuance of a warrant by the magistrate for a violation of Va. Code Ann. §§ 18.2-266 or 18.2-268.3, or any similar local ordinance, the person's license shall be suspended immediately for seven days. The magistrate is a judicial officer for this purpose and his decision is pursuant to a judicial proceeding. Va. Const. art. VI, § 8. Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-48.1.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Violation Code 18.2-266

Virginia DUI Prince William Lawyers

Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with a traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you? 

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?

We have defended many traffic tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Attillis v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Defendant was convicted in the Circuit Court of Prince William (Virginia) of felony driving under the influence (DUI), third or subsequent offense, in violation of Va. Code Ann. §§ 18.2-266 and 18.2-270. Defendant appealed.

            If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • In enacting Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-384, the legislature, in its wisdom, determined that a Department of Motor Vehicles transcript, certified pursuant to Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-215, shall be prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein with respect to the prior offense. Prima facie evidence is sufficient to raise a presumption of fact or establish the fact in question unless rebutted.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Second Subsequent Offense Violation Code 18.2-266

Virginia DUI Prince William Lawyers

Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with a traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you? 

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?

We have defended many traffic tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Frank v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Defendant was convicted in the Circuit Court of Prince William (Virginia) of felony driving under the influence (DUI), second or subsequent offense, in violation of Va. Code Ann. §§ 18.2-266 and 18.2-270. Defendant appealed.

            If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • In enacting Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-384, the legislature, in its wisdom, determined that a Department of Motor Vehicles transcript, certified pursuant to Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-215, shall be prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein with respect to the prior offense. Prima facie evidence is sufficient to raise a presumption of fact or establish the fact in question unless rebutted.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Violation Code 18.2-266

Virginia DUI Prince William Lawyers

Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with a traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you? 

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?

We have defended many traffic tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Samuel v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Defendant appealed her convictions by the Circuit Court of Prince William (Virginia), for driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266 and for involuntary manslaughter in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-36.1(A).

            If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • Virginia's "implied consent" law, as it existed at the time of the offense, provided that: (A) any person who operates a motor vehicle upon a highway in this Commonwealth shall be deemed thereby, as a condition of such operation, to have consented to have samples of his blood, breath, or both blood and breath taken for a chemical test to determine the alcohol, drug, or both alcohol and drug content of his blood, if he is arrested for a violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266 (driving under the influence) or of a similar ordinance within two hours of the alleged offense. Section 18.2-268.2(A). If the blood or breathalyzer test reveals a particular level of blood alcohol content (.10 percent at the date of the instant offense), the Commonwealth is entitled to a rebuttable presumption that the defendant was intoxicated. Section § 18.2-269.

  • Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-36.1 stated at the time of the offense that any person who, as a result of driving under the influence in violation of § 18.2-266(ii), (iii), or (iv), unintentionally causes the death of another person, shall be guilty of involuntary manslaughter. Section 18.2-36.1(A).
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:


These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Tuesday, March 4, 2014

Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Violation Code 18.2-270

Virginia DUI Prince William Lawyers

Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with a traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you? 

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?

We have defended many traffic tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Thomas v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Defendant was convicted in the Circuit Court of Prince William (Virginia) of felony driving under the influence (DUI), third or subsequent offense, in violation of Va. Code Ann. §§ 18.2-266 and 18.2-270. Defendant appealed.

            If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • In enacting Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-384, the legislature, in its wisdom, determined that a Department of Motor Vehicles transcript, certified pursuant to Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-215, shall be prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein with respect to the prior offense. Prima facie evidence is sufficient to raise a presumption of fact or establish the fact in question unless rebutted.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Monday, March 3, 2014

Virginia DUI Lawyers Prince William Driving Influence Alcohol

Virginia DUI Prince William Lawyers

Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with a traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you? 

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?

We have defended many traffic tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Moore v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Defendant appealed from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Prince William (Virginia) that found him to be a habitual offender pursuant to Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-351 et seq. Defendant had multiple convictions for driving while under the influence of alcohol (DUI).

            If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • If a conviction in another state is based on conduct which is not a violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266, then to consider it under Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-351 would, without authority, expand the scope of the convictions which could be considered beyond that which the Virginia General Assembly specifically authorized.
  • In order to adjudicate a defendant an habitual offender based upon a conviction from another state, only that prohibition of the other state's law under which the person was convicted must substantially conform to Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Our Phone #

Prince William Virginia

Prince William 703-278-0405
Click here to call us toll free Sris Lawyer Click here to call us toll free

Social Icons

Powered by Blogger.